This biographical fiction traces the life of a young doctor as a fugitive from justice after committing a heinous crime. He escapes to east Africa where he establishes a new successful life in a British protectorate, which is troubled by demands for independence. After ten years on the run he is apprehended and returned to England, where he is given a long and often fearful prison sentence. On release he tries to settle but he decides to return to Africa, where he is reunited with his family. Tragedy strikes. Finally, forlorn and alone, he assesses his life.

The killing of a policeman in cold blood in a suburban street; a manipulative and bullying criminal; the fractured lives of dependents; a capricious politician; adulterous relationships. Reality casts its dark shadow in this fictional story.

Full Title: "Staples Coal Company, Managing Owner of Barge "Santiago," v. Steam Pilot-Boat "Philadelphia.""Description: "The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification: ++++2Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCourt RecordHarvard Law School Libraryc.1905

Full Title: "Staples Coal Company, as Managing Owner of The Barge "Santiago" vs. Steam Pilot Boat "Philadelphia," her Engines, Tackle and Apparel"Description: "The Making of the Modern Law: Trials, 1600-1926" collection provides descriptions of the major trials from over 300 years, with official trial documents, unofficially published accounts of the trials, briefs and arguments and more. Readers can delve into sensational trials as well as those precedent-setting trials associated with key constitutional and historical issues and discover, including the Amistad Slavery case, the Dred Scott case and Scopes "monkey" trial."Trials" provides unfiltered narrative into the lives of the trial participants as well as everyday people, providing an unparalleled source for the historical study of sex, gender, class, marriage and divorce.++++The below data was compiled from various identification fields in the bibliographic record of this title. This data is provided as an additional tool in helping to insure edition identification: ++++2 of 1905Eastern District of PennsylvaniaCourt RecordHarvard Law School Libraryc.1905

Presented to Margaret Hall by her friends and associates who have known her at Oxford University, this book addresses some of the major issues associated with competition in theory and practice. The main feature of the book is a piece on privatization by a Nobel prize winner in economics. Among other essays, Paul Samuelson considers the theoretical underpinning of privatizing state assets. Mary Gregory ponders on the possibility of co-operation rather than competition between employer and worker and whether incomes policies are likely to feature on a medium-term political agenda.

This book addresses some of the major issues associated with competition in theory and practice. Among other essays, Paul Samuelson considers the theoretical underpinning of privatising state assets. Mary Gregory ponders on the possibility of cooperation rather than competition between employer and worker and whether incomes policies are likely to feature on a medium-term political agenda. Christopher Moir claims that food retail markets are not as competitive as is often claimed and that large food retailers may enjoy monopoly profits. Aubrey Silbertson very cogently sets out the orthodox case for removing trade protection on the industrialised world's clothing industries.